Chase/Class Action Law Suits

From Why Dont Russians Smile The definitive guide to the differences between Russians and Americans
Jump to: navigation, search

Past law suits against Chase

For creating template
Case Name Type of Case Bank sued Facts State Federal District Outcome Source . .
Belyea v. Litton Loan Servicing Class Action Massachusetts HAMP Trial Period Plan (TPP) Contract Claims - National Consumer Law Center
Bosque v. Wells Fargo Class Action Massachusetts HAMP Trial Period Plan (TPP) Contract Claims - National Consumer Law Center
Calfee v. Citimortgage Class Action Massachusetts HAMP Trial Period Plan (TPP) Contract Claims - National Consumer Law Center
Durmic v. J.P. Morgan Chase Class Action CHASE Massachusetts HAMP Trial Period Plan (TPP) Contract Claims - National Consumer Law Center
Johnson v. Bank of America Home Loans Servicing Class Action Massachusetts HAMP Trial Period Plan (TPP) Contract Claims - National Consumer Law Center
JPMorgan Chase Mortgage Modification Litigation, MDL No. 2290, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts Class Action CHASE Failed to offer timely and proper permanent loan modifications after they completed TPP under HAMP or Chase’s own equivalent programs. Chase was liable for breach of contract, unfair trade practices and other violations of the law. Massachusetts JPMorgan Chase Mortgage Modification Class Action Settlement
Stewart v. Biermen, Geesing, Ward & Wood Law Firm, Unnamed Fidelity National Information Services Class Action Maryland
Jones v. HSBC, Wells Fargo, BH&L Class Action HSBC, Wells Fargo, BH&L

Maryland

Stewart

Stewart v. Biermen, Geesing, Ward & Wood Law Firm, Unamed Fidelity National Information Services[1][2]

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) (15 U.S.C. 1692, et seq.)

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION Wrongful Foreclosure: Failure to Comply with Maryland Real Property Article, §§ 7-501.1 or 7-105.2

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION Negligence

FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of the Maryland Consumer Protection Act (MCPA) (Md. Code., Com. Law., §§ 13-101, et seq.)

FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION Declaratory Judgement (MD. CODE ANN., CTS. & Jud. Proc., 3-406)

SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION Respondent Superior

Jones

Jones v. HSBC, Wells Fargo, BH&L[3]

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION - Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) (15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq.)

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION - Wrongful Foreclosure: Failure to Comply with Maryland Real Property Article, §§ 7-105.1 or 7-105.2

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF THE MARYLAND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION - BREACH OF CONTRACT – IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING

FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION - UNJUST ENRICHMENT/CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST

SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION - INJUNCTIVE / DECLARATORY RELIEF

SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION - COMMON LAW FRAUD

Notes

  1. Stewart v. Biermen, Geesing, Ward & Wood Law Firm, Unamed Fidelity National Information Services, Stop Foreclosure Fraud
  2. Stewart et al v. Bierman et al, No. 8:2010cv02822 - Document 29 (D. Md. 2011), Justia.
  3. Jones v. HSBC, Wells Fargo, BH&L, Stop Foreclosure Fraud