Difference between revisions of "Chase/Class Action Law Suits"
m (Admin moved page Class Action Law Suits to Chase/Class Action Law Suits) |
m (1 revision imported) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 13:17, 17 February 2023
Past law suits against Chase
- For creating template
Case Name | Type of Case | Bank sued | Facts | State | Federal District | Outcome | Source | . | . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Belyea v. Litton Loan Servicing | Class Action | Massachusetts | HAMP Trial Period Plan (TPP) Contract Claims - National Consumer Law Center | |||||||
Bosque v. Wells Fargo | Class Action | Massachusetts | HAMP Trial Period Plan (TPP) Contract Claims - National Consumer Law Center | |||||||
Calfee v. Citimortgage | Class Action | Massachusetts | HAMP Trial Period Plan (TPP) Contract Claims - National Consumer Law Center | |||||||
Durmic v. J.P. Morgan Chase | Class Action | CHASE | Massachusetts | HAMP Trial Period Plan (TPP) Contract Claims - National Consumer Law Center | ||||||
Johnson v. Bank of America Home Loans Servicing | Class Action | Massachusetts | HAMP Trial Period Plan (TPP) Contract Claims - National Consumer Law Center | |||||||
JPMorgan Chase Mortgage Modification Litigation, MDL No. 2290, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts | Class Action | CHASE | Failed to offer timely and proper permanent loan modifications after they completed TPP under HAMP or Chase’s own equivalent programs. Chase was liable for breach of contract, unfair trade practices and other violations of the law. | Massachusetts | JPMorgan Chase Mortgage Modification Class Action Settlement | |||||
Stewart v. Biermen, Geesing, Ward & Wood Law Firm, Unnamed Fidelity National Information Services | Class Action | Maryland | ||||||||
Jones v. HSBC, Wells Fargo, BH&L | Class Action | HSBC, Wells Fargo, BH&L | ||||||||
Maryland
Stewart
Stewart v. Biermen, Geesing, Ward & Wood Law Firm, Unamed Fidelity National Information Services[1][2]
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) (15 U.S.C. 1692, et seq.)
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION Wrongful Foreclosure: Failure to Comply with Maryland Real Property Article, §§ 7-501.1 or 7-105.2
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION Negligence
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of the Maryland Consumer Protection Act (MCPA) (Md. Code., Com. Law., §§ 13-101, et seq.)
FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION Declaratory Judgement (MD. CODE ANN., CTS. & Jud. Proc., 3-406)
SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION Respondent Superior
Jones
Jones v. HSBC, Wells Fargo, BH&L[3]
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION - Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) (15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq.)
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION - Wrongful Foreclosure: Failure to Comply with Maryland Real Property Article, §§ 7-105.1 or 7-105.2
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF THE MARYLAND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION - BREACH OF CONTRACT – IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING
FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION - UNJUST ENRICHMENT/CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION - INJUNCTIVE / DECLARATORY RELIEF
SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION - COMMON LAW FRAUD
Notes
- ↑ Stewart v. Biermen, Geesing, Ward & Wood Law Firm, Unamed Fidelity National Information Services, Stop Foreclosure Fraud
- ↑ Stewart et al v. Bierman et al, No. 8:2010cv02822 - Document 29 (D. Md. 2011), Justia.
- ↑ Jones v. HSBC, Wells Fargo, BH&L, Stop Foreclosure Fraud